How our small organisation struggles against logistics challenges in Bangladesh

January 20, 2026

Ishak Mia (Sohel)

A group of men stand side by side holding clear plastic bags of food supplies labeled “Emergency Flood Relief 2024,” showing rice and other staples distributed as aid.

Bangladesh is one of the world’s most climate-vulnerable countries. Its geography, with dense rivers, proximity to the Himalayas, and a fragile coastline along the Bay of Bengal, exposes millions of people to floods in the north and east, cyclones along the coast, tidal surges, and landslides in hilly areas. Because the country is densely populated and resources are limited, even a single disaster can push communities into crisis almost instantly.

As a small humanitarian organisation working on the ground, we have witnessed first-hand how these disasters disrupt lives. While large-scale events make headlines, countless families suffer from smaller, localised emergencies such as riverbank erosion, sudden storms, lightning strikes, flash floods, or fires. These ‘pocket disasters”’ often go unnoticed by international agencies, but the impact on affected families is devastating. In the first hours of a crisis, when every minute counts, it is small organisations like ours that often act as the first responders.

Large national and international agencies have substantial funding, systems and logistical capacity. However, their arrival is often delayed by administrative procedures and mobilisation timelines. In contrast, we are already on the ground. We rely on community trust and local knowledge to evacuate families, provide shelter, or distribute dry rations before larger operations can begin. Yet despite our commitment, we are consistently constrained by one major challenge: weak logistics and supply-chain capacity.

The logistics challenge: scarcity and access

For us, logistics is the backbone of our humanitarian work. Every aid package we send involves a journey from procurement to delivery, and for small organisations, this journey is full of obstacles.

Unlike larger agencies that have long-term supplier contracts, we often must purchase relief items from local markets during emergencies. This exposes us to sudden price increases and shortages. Reaching affected communities is another major hurdle. River islands, wetlands, coastal zones and hilly areas require boats or special vehicles. During disasters, transport becomes scarce and expensive, quickly exhausting our limited budget.

We faced this challenge during Cyclone Mocha in May 2023. When the cyclone hit small islands such as St. Martin’s Island in the Bay of Bengal, its isolation became a logistical nightmare. We had no access to proper sea-going vessels and had to rely on traditional wooden boats. Rough seas kept life-saving aid stuck on the mainland for days. Similarly, during the Feni flash floods in 2024, demand for rescue boats far exceeded supply. Despite our efforts, we could not reach trapped families because boats were either unavailable or destroyed by the floods.

Storage adds another layer of difficulty. Relief items, particularly food and medicine, need safe, dry storage. We have no dedicated warehouses and are often forced to keep supplies in temporary or open spaces. During the monsoon or flood events, items get damaged by rain or floodwater and remain at risk of theft. These challenges make it difficult to ensure that aid reaches communities in usable condition.

Technical and coordination gaps in our work

Effective supply chains rely not only on funds and supplies but also on planning, data and skilled personnel. For a small organisation like ours, hiring dedicated logistics or supply chain staff is rarely possible. Operational staff, including ourselves, are expected to manage procurement, transportation, storage and distribution alongside all other programme responsibilities.

In addition, most staff at small organisations do not have sufficient knowledge of internationally recognised standards and best practices in humanitarian logistics and supply-chain management. Without formal training in areas such as route optimisation, warehouse management, or emergency procurement standards, staff must rely on experience and improvisation. While this dedication is admirable, it limits the efficiency, accountability and predictability of aid delivery.

This often means that a single team member is simultaneously coordinating with affected communities, negotiating with suppliers, arranging transport and tracking inventory. Without formal logistics training, we handle route planning, estimating quantities and maintaining inventory manually under extreme pressure. This can lead to delays, inefficient routing, overstocking in some areas and shortages in others. During emergencies, these challenges become even more pronounced, reducing the overall effectiveness of our life-saving interventions.

Limited logistics capacity also affects accountability. Without proper systems, keeping accurate records of stock levels, distribution lists and delivery timelines is difficult. Even when aid reaches people honestly, post-distribution reporting becomes time-consuming and sometimes incomplete. This can undermine donor confidence and limit future funding, trapping small organisations like ours in a cycle of under-resourcing despite being the first responders on the ground.

Digital tools could help us overcome some of these limitations. Simple systems for inventory tracking, GPS-based delivery monitoring, or beneficiary databases can greatly improve transparency and coordination. Yet our lack of funding and technical capacity forces us to rely on paper-based systems. Manual records slow decision-making, increase errors and make coordination with other organisations more challenging.

What needs to change for organisations like ours

If small organisations are expected to continue acting as first responders, we must see sustained support to strengthen our logistics and supply-chain capacity.

Invest in logistics infrastructure

Donors should provide flexible funding for boats, vehicles, storage facilities and emergency transport, especially in disaster-prone and hard-to-reach areas. These assets should be treated as essential life-saving tools, not overhead costs. When larger aid agencies share their transport and infrastructure with local organisations like ours, it can greatly enhance the speed, efficiency and reach of emergency response.

Build human capacity

We need support to recruit or train dedicated logistics staff. Providing training in humanitarian logistics and supply-chain management, along with route planning, inventory management and emergency procurement, can dramatically improve the efficiency, accountability and reliability of aid delivery. Supporting staff capacity ensures we are not overburdened while managing complex crises.

Adopt appropriate digital tools

Affordable digital systems for inventory tracking, participant registration and delivery monitoring can reduce errors and improve coordination. Tools must be practical for low-connectivity environments and paired with hands-on training to ensure effectiveness.

Ensure inclusive coordination

Emergency coordination mechanisms must include local and small organisations. Including local actors ensures remote and marginalised areas are not overlooked and that aid reaches those most in need. Effective coordination also prevents overlapping deliveries and promotes equitable distribution.

Adopt flexible funding and partnerships

We operate on extremely limited budgets. Flexible, multi-year funding allows us to maintain essential logistics capacity, purchase critical assets in advance, and respond quickly to disasters. Partnerships with larger agencies should focus on capacity-sharing, technical support and mentorship rather than replacing local actors. Local knowledge is invaluable in the first critical hours of a crisis.

Conclusion

Bangladesh’s vulnerability to both large and localised disasters highlights the critical role of small humanitarian organisations like ours. We are often the first on the scene, navigating hazardous conditions to reach communities before larger agencies can react. Yet our effectiveness is consistently constrained by challenges in logistics, technical capacity and supply-chain management.

To ensure timely and equitable aid, these constraints must be addressed. Investing in transport, storage, skilled personnel, digital tools and inclusive coordination will strengthen local organisations and the overall humanitarian system. Supporting small first responders is not optional. It is essential to saving lives, protecting communities and building resilience in the face of increasingly frequent disasters.


Ishak Mia (Sohel) is the Director of Project Planning and Management at Social Aid, a local humanitarian organisation based in Bangladesh.

Comments

Thanks for choosing to leave a comment. Please keep in mind that all comments are moderated according to our comment policy.

Let’s have a personal and meaningful conversation.

Can you help translate this article?

We want to reach as many people as possible. If you can help translate this article, get in touch.
Contact us

Did you find everything you were looking for?

Your valuable input helps us shape the future of HPN.

Would you like to write for us?

We welcome submissions from our readers on relevant topics. If you would like to have your work published on HPN, we encourage you to sign up as an HPN member where you will find further instructions on how to submit content to our editorial team.
Our Guidance