Could guns and rain spell the end for the Karamojong?

Monday, January 25, 2010 by By Marco Ferloni, Mark O’Keefe, Dr Phil OKeefe, Dr Geoff O’Brien.

Over one million people live in Karamoja, a region found in the north Eastern part of Uganda. To a visitor passing through from the capital city Kampala, Karamoja may look like any other region in Uganda but appearances can be deceptive. The region is characterised by the worst humanitarian and development indicators in Uganda.

The problem of underdevelopment in Karamoja is often characterised as a ‘cultural’ problem, however, this needs to be understood within the delicate livelihood systems that operate within the region. The people of Karamoja have traditionally based their livelihood on agro-pastoralism. Like many other pastoral societies in East Africa, cattle provide the means for economic and social exchange, they are central to the Karamojong’s [1] way of life . However in recent years, insecurity, inability to access former grazing land and  livestock raiding, dramatically reduced the amount of cattle in Karamoja. The reduction of cattle is compounded by frequent droughts and failing crop production. These factors have made it difficult to rely on agro-pastoralism to provide a livelihood.  

Guns

The rise in violence, and in particular gun crime in Karamoja, has been driven by a number of factors. The desertion of Idi Amin’s forces in 1979 from the Moroto Barracks allowed tribes such as the Matheniko tribe to access  large supplies of  AK-47’s. This initiated a cycle of armament within the region. At the same time the civil war within the North of Uganda diverted economic and military resources from Karamoja, therefore weakening government security and severely restricting capital investment.  The lax security situation and easy access to small arms only compounded  the strong warrior culture already embedded within the local communities.  Attacks and killings in neighbouring tribal lands as well as cattle raiding and destroying crops/property increased . A long history of disarmament campaigns have been unsuccessful in removing weapons from the region and have bred distrust and resentment towards the government.

Rain

The Karamojong depend on rainfall for survival. However rainfall is now more variable, due to climatic change compounded by  local deforestation. There is now less water available for agricultural activities and for the re growth of indigenous vegetation- It is apparent that rain-fed agricultural production is failing year after year.

For this reason, Karamoja can be perceived as being in state of emergency transition, a situation where the population relies on external organisations to largely support survival strategies. The Karamojong  are dependent on external food aid, both in terms of food for consumption and seeds for food production which are planted for every new season.  However, for the past three years many households have received little or no harvest. Evidently, the prospect for long-term development does not lie with continuation of the status quo.

What is happening in Karamoja now?  Change is occurring in Karamoja. However, external actors drive that change. A government official stated that: “To change the people and become partners first we have to disorganise the existing setup and create another setup”. Within this framework of change, cultural and participatory issues become central. The Karamojong culture, without considering tribal differences, is based on a strong patriarchal structure where women are relegated to the margins and where children are forced to work rather than attending formal education. A system  not attuned to the western/northern/developed countries ideal of development, civil society, and human rights issues  begs the question- what is it going to be sacrificed in the name of the ‘development’? And who is going to sacrifice it?

 

Possible ways forward

Within such a complex scenario it is not easy to find a fair compromise between the old to be changed and the new to be established. What would the Karamojong do if they could decide  themselves? It is difficult to say but akey point seems to be the participation of those rural communities who are actually in danger of ‘extinction’. We think that the Karamojong people deserve the right to be consulted about their future. Whenever transformations take place, changes are less painful if the ‘objects’ of change become the ‘actors’ in the process itself.

For those in charge of development planning in the region,  now is a good opportunity to show how much  has been learnt  in the past forty years.  Finding a comprise with the Karamonjong  that reflects the need for economic growth , that  respects   their cultural differences and understands their capacity to comply with basic human rights is key  to improving long term livelihood strategies In the future.

 


[1] The authors use Karamojong as a term to define the different ethnic groups living in the Karamoja region


Responses to 'Could guns and rain spell the end for the Karamojong?'

Dear authors and Mark specifically,
It is a good piece of literature and advocacy prospectus for Karamoja.
It is just a tip of iceberg and with my critical analysis in the 20 months I have worked in Karamoja, I can breakdown Karamoja issues into 3:-
1. External and National Influence
2. Natural phenomena
3. Human activities
External and National Influence is that most of the policies or interventions in Karamoja are copied from elsewhere and pasted in Karamoja. Karamoja is a drought-prone semi-arid area with pastoralists and this should be in the minds of Karamoja stakeholders all the time. Karamoja needs a clear context and area specif policy to guide whatever is done here. Programming in pasoralists' areas involved in armed conflict is quite complex and a lot needs to be considered and taken care of before any long-term decisions are made.

Natural phemonena:
Drought, floods, and the other calamities are quite common in Karamoja because of the location of Karamoja on the Western edge of the Great Eastern East African Rift Valley and this has had some interesting impact on the climate of the area, the soil nature, the water beds et al and has made productive activities difficult. This has led people to adopt coping mechanisms that are now characterized as the real problems of Karamoja.

Human Activities
Traditional practices such as cattle rustling, economic activities such as charcoal burning and mining of minerals have all led to a systematic degradation of environment and conflict. Natural resource utilization is regulated using 'jungle laws'. All these in brief makes Karamoja a very complex area to deal with or think about and there is need for both local, national and international long term commitments to try and sort out the Karamoja issue.

Francis Obita   Posted on: Saturday, January 02, 2010

Leave a comment

Comments on this site are moderated. HPN will post as many of your comments as possible but we cannot guarantee to publish them all. We also reserve the right not to publish certain comments.

To verify your feedback, please type the following number in the box below

HPN is run by the Humanitarian Policy Group (HPG) which is part of the Overseas Development Institute (ODI). The views and opinions expressed in HPN publications do not necessarily state or reflect those of HPG or ODI.
All material © 2010 ODI HPN. Site built and maintained by PC Five.